No shared quality baseline
Every project starts with a different toolset — hard to compare quality across clients and teams on one scale.
Before you take on maintenance: set a baseline, build a technical backlog for your team, and verify the project after a migration or release. Insight organizes findings in one report — for developers and for the client.
The Free plan covers one project — no credit card required.
Four problems that return with every client handover and maintenance engagement.
Every project starts with a different toolset — hard to compare quality across clients and teams on one scale.
Without a recorded technical state, handover becomes a verbal bug list — the client cannot see what existed on day one.
Without a reference point you cannot tell old debt from problems introduced in the latest release.
After a migration or release it is hard to show the client quality improved — because there is no saved state from before.
Insight modules
Each module checks the client project’s public layer on the same scale — from handover through maintenance to post-release verification.
LCP, INP and CLS across the mobile purchase path — from homepage to checkout.
Core Web Vitals and slowdown causes on client sites — with priorities instead of a single score.
View moduleThree moments when a software house needs a documented quality outcome.
Establish the project’s entry state and separate legacy debt from issues your team should fix first.
Check the site’s public layer and generate a prioritized report — before the client signs acceptance.
Compare key URLs and results after go-live. Show the client what changed in the same metrics.
Process
From the project URL through baseline and priorities to a client report and a follow-up check after delivery.
Paste the client domain, staging environment or representative URLs after migration.
Insight checks performance, SEO, accessibility, security and ecology on one scale.
Findings are ordered by impact — the team knows where to start and the client sees scope.
A report for the client, then another analysis with diff after release or migration.
Analyzing…
After analysis
A documented quality outcome — a backlog for developers and a report for the client at handover or during maintenance.
See Insight modulesA project quality baseline on one scale — instead of results from several tools.
A technical backlog ordered by impact and urgency.
Documented issue scope for the acceptance record.
A client-ready report with date, sources and priorities.
Before/after comparison after migration or release in the same metrics.
Visible configuration risks — with areas flagged for manual review.
Add the project URL and run an analysis. Insight checks the site’s public layer across all modules on one scale — the result is saved as a reference point for the team and future measurements.
Yes. An analysis before handing the site to the client gives you a documented issue scope and priorities — handover material instead of a verbal bug list.
No. Insight analyzes the public layer and organizes findings, but it does not replace expert acceptance, penetration testing or formal compliance assessment. It flags areas that need further review.
One project with a basic analysis — enough to try the product on a real client project. Full history, monitoring and multi-project reporting are on paid plans. Limit details are on the pricing page.
Before you take on maintenance or hand the site to the client, check technical quality and build a prioritized backlog.